Prediction of Giovanni Lelli Mami vs Paul Dogger Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
G. Lelli Mami vs P. Dogger

Giovanni Lelli Mami

ITA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

6'1" (185 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

308

Best Rank

191

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Paul Dogger

NED

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

6'1" (185 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

308

Best Rank

191

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Mami 1 - 0 Dogger

They have played 3 sets in total, with Giovanni Lelli Mami winning 2 and Paul Dogger winning 1. The last match between Giovanni Lelli Mami and Paul Dogger was at the Nairobi CH, 22-02-1988, Round: R3, Surface: Clay, with Giovanni Lelli Mami getting the victory 1-6 7-6 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Mami	1
Dogger	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R3) Nairobi CH(02-22-88)

Stats

Giovanni Lelli Mami

Paul Dogger

G. L. Mami vs P. Dogger H2H Profile

G. L. Mami	Stats	P. Dogger
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
35.29% (6-11)	Career Total W/L	41.94% (13-18)
1	Clay	0
0	Titles	1
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

G. L. Mami vs P. Dogger Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Giovanni Lelli Mami has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Paul Dogger has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Giovanni Lelli Mami, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Paul Dogger has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Giovanni Lelli Mami has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Paul Dogger has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Giovanni Lelli Mami has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Paul Dogger winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Giovanni Lelli Mami has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 6/10), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/1). Paul Dogger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 13/16), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 13/16).
Player level: In the last year, Giovanni Lelli Mami has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Paul Dogger has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Giovanni Lelli Mami winning 1 times and Paul Dogger being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Giovanni Lelli Mami winning 2 and Paul Dogger winning 1.
The last match between Giovanni Lelli Mami and Paul Dogger was at the Nairobi CH, 22-02-1988, Round: R3, Surface: Clay, with Giovanni Lelli Mami getting the victory 1-6 7-6 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Giovanni Lelli Mami has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Paul Dogger has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Giovanni Lelli Mami has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Paul Dogger has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Giovanni Lelli Mami has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Paul Dogger has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Giovanni Lelli Mami vs Paul Dogger Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

G. L. Mami vs P. Dogger H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

G. L. Mami	Stats	P. Dogger
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
14	Games Won	15
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

G. L. Mami Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Citta di Brindisi - Brindisi - 27-08-2001
Q1 Alessandro ColaianniA. Colaianni	W	6-2 6-3	Stats
Q2 Stefano CobolliS. Cobolli	L	6-3 4-6 6-4	Stats
Bari - 19-09-1988
R3 Christian MiniussiC. Miniussi	L	6-1 6-2	Stats
Budapest CH - 12-09-1988
R3 Srinivasan VasudevanS. Vasudevan	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
Nairobi CH - 22-02-1988
R3 Paul DoggerP. Dogger	W	1-6 7-6 6-3	Stats

View All

P. Dogger Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Umag - 14-05-1990
R1 Roberto AzarR. Azar	L	6-2 6-3	Stats
Hilversum - 24-07-1989
R3 Javier SanchezJ. Sanchez	L	6-3 7-6	Stats
Hanko CH - 17-07-1989
QF Andres VysandA. Vysand	L	6-2 7-6	Stats
R4 Lars Anders WahlgrenL. Anders	W	6-1 6-0	Stats
R3 Hans SchwaierH. Schwaier	W	6-2 7-6	Stats

View All

G. L. Mami vs P. Dogger Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

G. L. Mami	Stats	P. Dogger
35.29% (6/11)	YTD Win/Loss	41.94% (13/18)
39.02% (16/25)	Sets Win/Loss	43.84% (32/41)
44.30% (167/210)	Games Win/Loss	47.75% (339/371)
0.00% (0/1)	Hard Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
37.50% (6/10)	Clay Win/Loss	44.83% (13/16)
0% (0/0)	Indoor Hard W/L	0.00% (0/2)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
541.76	Average Opponent Rank	335.26
0% (0/0)	Cups W/L	0.00% (0/2)
0.00% (0/1)	Main Tour W/L	20.00% (1/4)
37.50% (6/10)	Challenger W/L	50.00% (12/12)
35% (6/17)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	43% (13/30)
0% (0/0)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/1)
43% (3/7)	Deciding Set Win %	40% (4/10)
67% (6/4)	1st Set Won, Won Match	71% (14/10)
33% (6/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	29% (14/4)
18% (11/2)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	18% (17/3)